Context and problem
The process depended on spreadsheets, network folders, paper and individual memory. Finding the right asset, proving execution or recovering history required manual work.
CASE / VESPER-MANUTENCAO
CONFIDENTIAL CASEVesper Manutenção
Assets, checklists, evidence and traceability
I digitized a process previously dependent on spreadsheets, network folders, paper and individual memory, creating a central source for equipment-maintenance records.
Current use2 responsible users record · Quality reviews
Scope40+ assets/equipment
FocusTraceability · evidence · history
SCREENS AND FLOWS
See the system in use
Screens and flows that show how the system works in practice.
About the images
The images below show the real product or sanitized reconstructions. When something is not a direct capture, the caption says so.
Public version limits
Operational data, credentials, private integrations and client information are not part of this publication.
What I did
Asset flow with code/tag/name, checklist, date/time, responsible person, photos, notes, evidence and server-side history.
How I built it
Changes preserve author and previous/new values; a new maintenance execution never overwrites the previous history.
Results and learning
- Text retrieval and document extraction implemented.
- Full semantic RAG under development.
Limits of this version
System and data remain private.
Next steps
Evolution depends on the state and limitations described in this case; it is not presented as an already delivered capability.
The public version contains no credentials, personal data or sensitive internal information.
Next projectField Maintenance
Contact